6

22 comments

[–] smallpond [OP] 0 points (+0|-0)

You have your own perception of what is "directly harming the environment". If you studied more you might change you opinion of what harms the environment, what harms it more severely, and what harms it in relatively irreversible ways.

Some people are not capable of a level of comprehension that lets them understand effects that can't be explained to young children. Hence it's important to have competent public science bodies that are trusted by the public.

[–] [Deleted] 0 points (+0|-0)

competent public science bodies that are trusted by the public.

Like Anthony 'trust the science' Fauci?

[–] smallpond [OP] 0 points (+0|-0)

Like Anthony 'trust the science' Fauci?

That's more an example of the opposite I think.

[–] [Deleted] 0 points (+0|-0)

Fauci is a prime example of the dangers you invite with a strong Federal government. Instead of everyone being allowed to take advice from their own trusted doctors, you have one central person(s) make choices for millions of people.