I did delete a comment immediately after I posted it in order to better present my statement. Is that a problem for you? If so, explain why.
I never presented an "Energy Balance Model" (?) argument and I am not a climatologist. I treat this as a political stunt, just like nearly everyone else who holds an opinion on the subject. Ask everyone you discuss this with, what degree they hold and what other scientific opinion is so dear.
I have no idea what this means:
It would also mean our remaining carbon budgetfor meeting the 2°C Paris target is about twice as large than if the mainstream consensus is right. If the consensus is correct, we’re on pace to blow through the remaining Paris carbon budget by around 2030.
I did delete a comment immediately after I posted it in order to better present my statement. Is that a problem for you? If so, explain why.
Some people feel that once they put their words on public record, it's only common courtesy to leave them there, especially when others may be replying to what they've written. It's a matter of character in my opinion.
Apart from the most minor grammar, if I need to edit my comment I'll make clear what I've edited. I don't delete comments, and if I make a mistake I try to leave it there and admit it.
I disagree that it's common courtesy for me to leave a post I found to include errors. Your editing decisions are your own. If you search my comments you will see I retain many comments edited simply for grammar or in need of specification, etc.
Let's address your insult to my character.
Editing published comments on an anonymous forum as Phuks.co have almost no relation to a person's character. Cloyingly farcical.
My character has nothing to do with your keyboard opinion but I am happier knowing I am not dragged down by Leftist rancor.
I see you deleted your other comment, bit of a habit with you. Have a read if you have time:
https://skepticalscience.com/