Depends how much of that corporate cool aid you've been sucking down...
I hope you're not going to tell me that you trust a couple of dodgy blogs over NASA and the United Nations?
Depends how much of that corporate cool aid you've been sucking down...
I hope you're not going to tell me that you trust a couple of dodgy blogs over NASA and the United Nations?
https://climate.nasa.gov/
I have no problem with NASA research, they generally are top notch. UN research though...I have a lot of issues with the UN and do not trust that they are acting in our best interests.
I have no problem with NASA research, they generally are top notch. UN research though...I have a lot of issues with the UN and do not trust that they are acting in our best interests.
I think if you bothered to read more about the science from reputable sources, you'd appreciate how confident we are that this is man made. But again, if you read my last comment, the sane thing is not to wait until we're 100% sure that we've doomed ourselves, it's to make sure that we're safe, and we're decades past that already. Structures are built to be safe under the vast majority of operating conditions, you wouldn't argue to continue using a bridge with the assurance that the best engineers are confident that it's going to collapse soon, but they can't yet be absolutely certain. Why would you take that insane stance for the world's climate?
No need to apologize as I can take much harsher language, and sometimes it's nice to speak plainly.