Your replies don't really make sense here. Reread what /u/Dii_Casses and I said again. If human CO2 is e.g. 1/100th of the cause of warming, it doesn't matter how much CO2 we've put out since industrialization, and it therefore doesn't matter if we completely eliminate our CO2 production; the effect of both is insignificant compared to other causes, and any warming that happens would happen regardless because our contribution would be insignificant. Is reducing warming by 0.01C meaningful in your opinion? Or are you disagreeing about something else?
Your replies don't really make sense here. Reread what /u/Dii_Casses and I said again. If _human_ CO2 is e.g. 1/100th of the cause of warming, it doesn't matter how much CO2 we've put out since industrialization, and it therefore doesn't matter if we completely eliminate our CO2 production; the effect of both is insignificant compared to other causes, and any warming that happens would happen regardless because our contribution would be insignificant. Is reducing warming by 0.01C meaningful in your opinion? Or are you disagreeing about something else?
Which is very unlikely as the CO2 in the atmosphere started with the industrialization and increase correlates very much with fossil energy use.
Regardless what put it there, removing some of it would save many species and many human lives. Another recent study said warming could be kept within 1.5C by planting trees.