In the emails, the company also wrote that their contract and acceptable use policy allows them to block websites if they deem the content "break any rules (sic) or illegal or harmful to our customers and more."
As much as I hate twitter and facebook the precedent of allowing ISPs to pick and choose which content they allow customers to access is dangerous.
>In the emails, the company also wrote that their contract and acceptable use policy allows them to block websites if they deem the content "break any rules (sic) or illegal or harmful to our customers and more."
As much as I hate twitter and facebook the precedent of allowing ISPs to pick and choose which content they allow customers to access is dangerous.
As much as I hate twitter and facebook the precedent of allowing ISPs to pick and choose which content they allow customers to access is dangerous.