3

7 comments

[–] yeti 1 points (+1|-0) Edited

Retarded. When you make a nice-looking graph which seems alarming, how about maybe you mark it and show the scale so that we can see that the big, scary red bar of us all being cooked to death actually only means less than a half degree warmer. And you should also mention that you didn't travel to the future with a thermometer, you and your buddies just made up a number which was slightly higher than the number we already experienced, because global warming and shit.

edit:

As the globe continues to warm, this sort of heat will spread, affecting more and more people for longer and longer periods of time.

Wow, that's a real scientific thing to say. The heat is "spreading."

[–] smallpond [OP] 1 points (+2|-1)

Did you miss the scale at the bottom of the page?

We're already about 1 degree Celsius above the historical average, if you actually wanted to see what another half a degree will do, you could try reading the UN climate report explaining just what 1.5 degrees means for the world.

[–] [Deleted] 0 points (+0|-0) Edited

What years are used to determine the historical average? I noticed if you set the birth date to 1910, as low as it goes, it looks like it all evens out.

I'm sure you recall in the 70s when the big story was human activity was leading us to a new ice age.

[–] PhunkyPlatypus 2 points (+2|-0)

And there has been absolutely no advancement in science and our understanding of climate since the 1970's. The goal of science is further understand and explain reality. So with new technology and better data collection, the sum of knowledge becomes more intricate and complete.

For example, In the 70's the thought of a human retrovirus was considered an absurdity, about a decade later we had a more complete picture and understanding of HIV.