1

For instance, click rates show that my sub is overwhelmingly popular with the general Phuks crowd – yet no one actually subscribes! =/

I understand. Obviously, this is due to cancel-culture peer pressure taking its toll. That, and of course also because our fans
especially those who come for their daily hateb0ner… ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
don’t have to subscribe, as via /all/new, they get all the good stuff without any commitment anyway!

I believe it is really a matter of fairness that the subs one enjoys in one’s feed, one also gets to be subscribed to. This could even be an automated process.

Then add a sitewide random sticky to the top of /all/new – to keep things nice’n’agitated.

Bᴀʀʀᴀɢᴇ ᴏғ ɴᴇᴏᴘʜᴏʙɪᴄ ʀᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟɪᴢᴀᴛɪᴏɴs ᴀs ᴛᴏ ᴡʜʏ ᴡᴇ ᴄᴀɴ’ᴛ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ɴɪᴄᴇ ᴛʜɪɴɢs ɪɴ 3, 2, 1, …

For instance, click rates show that *my* sub is ***overwhelmingly popular*** with the general Phuks crowd – yet **no one** actually subscribes! =/ I understand. Obviously, this is due to cancel-culture peer pressure taking its toll. That, and of course also because ***our fans*** – >! especially those who come for their daily hateb0ner… ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)!< – ***don’t have to*** subscribe, as via /all/new, they get all the good stuff without any commitment anyway! I believe it is really a matter of fairness that the subs one enjoys in one’s feed, one also gets to be subscribed to. This could even be an automated process. Then add a sitewide random sticky to the top of /all/new – to keep things nice’n’agitated. ***Bᴀʀʀᴀɢᴇ ᴏғ ɴᴇᴏᴘʜᴏʙɪᴄ ʀᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟɪᴢᴀᴛɪᴏɴs ᴀs ᴛᴏ ᴡʜʏ ᴡᴇ ᴄᴀɴ’ᴛ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ɴɪᴄᴇ ᴛʜɪɴɢs ɪɴ 3, 2, 1, …***

17 comments

[–] 16Mega [OP] -1 points (+1|-2)

Exactly. It's essentially a manipulation of public popularity numbers to keep underdogs down. Straight from Psy-Op 1O1.