12

Here is a small bit of context. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-19/new-zealand-facebook-christchurch-shooting-video-sheryl-sandberg/10915184

You can see halfway down the article where the site Kiwi farms basically told them to go fuck themselves and their response is to request more censorship at the upcoming G20 summit.

Should they stfu and go back to fucking sheep or should we think about the children?

Here is a small bit of context. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-19/new-zealand-facebook-christchurch-shooting-video-sheryl-sandberg/10915184 You can see halfway down the article where the site Kiwi farms basically told them to go fuck themselves and their response is to request more censorship at the upcoming G20 summit. Should they stfu and go back to fucking sheep or should we think about the children?

15 comments

[–] CDanger 4 points (+4|-0)

The good government of NZ has decided you've had too much to think. They can go back to their sheep shagging.

Censorship--in addition to its morally objectionable properties--is a bad practical idea and will just embolden and radicalise those who are curious or those who start wondering what the government has to hide. Citizens have a right to information and should not have to trust approved sources for the official version of events. The lack of foresight and historical understanding of the evils of censorship is astounding, and I hope those in countries with "hate speech" and other censorship laws think things through more than one step in the future and understand how banning things that are temporarily uncomfortable is foolish.

I'm very glad to see the phukers here seem to have figured this out.