12

Here is a small bit of context. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-19/new-zealand-facebook-christchurch-shooting-video-sheryl-sandberg/10915184

You can see halfway down the article where the site Kiwi farms basically told them to go fuck themselves and their response is to request more censorship at the upcoming G20 summit.

Should they stfu and go back to fucking sheep or should we think about the children?

Here is a small bit of context. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-19/new-zealand-facebook-christchurch-shooting-video-sheryl-sandberg/10915184 You can see halfway down the article where the site Kiwi farms basically told them to go fuck themselves and their response is to request more censorship at the upcoming G20 summit. Should they stfu and go back to fucking sheep or should we think about the children?

15 comments

[–] x0x7 5 points (+5|-0)

So I'm not a fan of sharing that video. I think it's the lowest form of human who watches that for fun.. but the only right response to a government threatening harm to people for sharing data is to post it everywhere.

I mean you should hack their systems and set all their pages to have it as a background

[–] MirrorMan 5 points (+6|-1)

Silencing anything is a horrible idea. We know they have the capability to gather information so why are they not using the footage as an opportunity to build a database of individuals to monitor? I don't think the only people watching the footage are deriving joy from the event. There is a valid interest in making sure what is being reported matches the footage of the event. If information is restricted then it can be falsified.