15

Specifically, something that allows the following item in the TOS to be removed or eased.

Posting content of any kind that incites discrimination, hate or violence towards one person or a group of people because of their belonging to a race, religion or nation is strictly prohibited.

Inciting 'discrimination, hate or violence' isn't my thing, but clearly it's important to many people who might contribute or increase site activity.

Free speech is an attractive ideal for me and many others - unfortunately following through with it means giving up a lot of website control.

Specifically, something that allows the following item in the TOS to be removed or eased. > Posting content of any kind that incites discrimination, hate or violence towards one person or a group of people because of their belonging to a race, religion or nation is strictly prohibited. Inciting 'discrimination, hate or violence' isn't my thing, but clearly it's important to many people who might contribute or increase site activity. Free speech is an attractive ideal for me and many others - unfortunately following through with it means giving up a lot of website control.

22 comments

I don't know if allowing those things is a good idea, I tried Voat for a while but I really didn't like it because all the racists who were banned from Reddit went there. I don't want Phuks to end the same.

[–] smallpond [OP] 1 points (+1|-0)

Voat effectively had censorship in place to protect the 'racists' and make sure more moderate viewpoints didn't gain a foothold. Despite what they say, Voat isn't what free speech looks like.