9

It was an amazing rush at the first few drops. Then the more I read the less I believed. I still want to hold on to the dimensional chess theory, but I just can't piece all the dots together in a fashion that makes sense.

What do you think?

It was an amazing rush at the first few drops. Then the more I read the less I believed. I still want to hold on to the dimensional chess theory, but I just can't piece all the dots together in a fashion that makes sense. What do you think?

8 comments

[–] [Deleted] 5 points (+5|-0)

i think whoever qanon is did a fine job of preying on people's emotions.

[–] Sarcastaway 3 points (+3|-0)

There just aren't enough hours in the day to hold down a job in politics while posting at that level. Therefore I am left only to assume that posting is Q's job. That just leaves the question of who's financing this circus. I have my suspicions, and but will keep them to myself because I have no proof.

Q has told a lot of truth, but all too often people use the truth as a cover for lies.

In short, Q is a distraction.

If you conspiracy-minded fellows want something to look into that isn't void of evidence, try looking into the trend of serial arson on the west coast this summer. The "space laser" narrative is a red haring. Unknown people are manually setting fires all up and down the west. Two men have been charged so far, and all the rest of the major fires in California and Oregon have not had their causes made public yet.

[–] jobes 3 points (+3|-0)

I think the theory of there being two Q's is accurate. The first/original Q seemed spot on, then the tone seemed to change suddenly, seeming like someone new was posting. Might have been legit originally, but not anymore.

[–] NPCat 3 points (+3|-0)

I agree, there was a sudden shift in tone right around the time the cbts stream people monetized their videostream and Q's trip code was "hacked" and and reinstated by a mod who happened to have very close ties to pamphletanon and his crew of swindlers. And then Q kicked out Corsi because he was monetizing, but left the monetized cbts stream be.

I think the original Q was an insider or operator, but his or her trip code was compromised and taken over.

[–] doggone 3 points (+3|-0)

All I know of Qanon is a couple of enigmatic posts from a year or two ago that carried the credibility of an UFO sighting.

For fun, I thought I may look into this guy to catch up on the situation,

https://nypost.com/2018/08/24/qanon-conspiracy-theorist-meets-trump-at-white-house/

[–] Adhdferret 2 points (+2|-0)

Q anon is bullshit. Plain and simple fortune cookie logic.

People will see what they want to see in everything around them. It is just like Kim Dot com and how he demands attention for shit. This shit is no different it seems. Just irrelevant people begging for attention.

[–] oddjob 1 points (+1|-0)

I equate QAnon to Nostradamus. He speaks in vague enough wording that you can hammer their words into meaning just about anything.

As a made-up example: QAnon #152839 - Something big is going to drop soon. BOOM BOOM!!!!!

A few days later, McCain dies. People will claim that Q told us that McCain was going to die because the 5 exclamation points were a hint that McCain wouldn't finish his sixth term and the 2 BOOMs were referencing his two-faced nature. It's absurd to think that the original post had any reference at all to McCain. You could also claim that QAnon was referencing the Jacksonville shooting. The 2 booms are the deaths and the 5 exclamation points are the five Democrat candidates for Governer in FL who are pushing for gun-control. Again, nothing in QAnon's post actually hints to this. People just force a meaning on QAnon's words and then go with it.

[–] Mattvision 1 points (+1|-0)

I still want to hold on to the dimensional chess theory

want

There's your problem right there. You should believe in what makes the most sense, rather than what you wish were true.