[–] PMYA 14 points (+14|-0) I think the general consensus is phukkers. I think the general consensus is phukkers. permalink source [–] E-werd 6 points (+6|-0) Seconding "phukkers" Seconding "phukkers" permalink source [–] GuyIDisagreeWith 1 points (+1|-0) Why the double 'k'? Why the double 'k'? permalink source [–] PMYA 2 points (+2|-0) With one k I feel like it would be pronounced like "fookers" With one k I feel like it would be pronounced like "fookers" permalink source [–] GuyIDisagreeWith 2 points (+2|-0) I get it. Wouldn't want anyone thinking we're football hooligans. I get it. Wouldn't want anyone thinking we're football hooligans. permalink source
[–] GuyIDisagreeWith 1 points (+1|-0) Why the double 'k'? Why the double 'k'? permalink source [–] PMYA 2 points (+2|-0) With one k I feel like it would be pronounced like "fookers" With one k I feel like it would be pronounced like "fookers" permalink source [–] GuyIDisagreeWith 2 points (+2|-0) I get it. Wouldn't want anyone thinking we're football hooligans. I get it. Wouldn't want anyone thinking we're football hooligans. permalink source
[–] PMYA 2 points (+2|-0) With one k I feel like it would be pronounced like "fookers" With one k I feel like it would be pronounced like "fookers" permalink source [–] GuyIDisagreeWith 2 points (+2|-0) I get it. Wouldn't want anyone thinking we're football hooligans. I get it. Wouldn't want anyone thinking we're football hooligans. permalink source
[–] GuyIDisagreeWith 2 points (+2|-0) I get it. Wouldn't want anyone thinking we're football hooligans. I get it. Wouldn't want anyone thinking we're football hooligans. permalink source
I think the general consensus is phukkers.