I wouldn't change history in order to prevent a paradox, erasing this future.
I think that messing with the past could delay WW2 which could result in a nuclear war. WW2 took place at an ideal time with the extremely limited nuke use. Too late and there could be a nuclear war. Too early and the true horror of the weapons wouldn't be know and that could cause nuclear war.
Id say that the 20th century is a risky period to mess with in time, until the very late 20th century post 85-ish.
I wouldn't change history in order to prevent a paradox, erasing this future.
I think that messing with the past could delay WW2 which could result in a nuclear war. WW2 took place at an ideal time with the extremely limited nuke use. Too late and there could be a nuclear war. Too early and the true horror of the weapons wouldn't be know and that could cause nuclear war.
Id say that the 20th century is a risky period to mess with in time, until the very late 20th century post 85-ish.
I wouldn't change history in order to prevent a paradox, erasing this future.
I think that messing with the past could delay WW2 which could result in a nuclear war. WW2 took place at an ideal time with the extremely limited nuke use. Too late and there could be a nuclear war. Too early and the true horror of the weapons wouldn't be know and that could cause nuclear war. Id say that the 20th century is a risky period to mess with in time, until the very late 20th century post 85-ish.