-3

There is something irrational in Phuks design. It looks like the designer has some kind of lack in logic, which made him design the site irrationally. It is enough to compare Phuks to Reddit or Voat to see obvious mistakes in interface ergonomics. Also the fact that this site is called Phuks instead of Phux denotes low level in wording creativity. Phuks needs the aid of professionals. Otherwise I don't see a bright future for it.

There is something irrational in Phuks design. It looks like the designer has some kind of lack in logic, which made him design the site irrationally. It is enough to compare Phuks to Reddit or Voat to see obvious mistakes in interface ergonomics. Also the fact that this site is called Phuks instead of Phux denotes low level in wording creativity. Phuks needs the aid of professionals. Otherwise I don't see a bright future for it.

30 comments

[–] InnocentBystander 10 points (+10|-0)

Feel free to spend your time at Voat or Reddit if you prefer those sites.

[–] Smartech [OP] -4 points (+0|-4) Edited

I am making constructive criticism. I would appreciate if puerile oligophrenics could refrain from posting mindless bullshit here.

[–] jidlaph 4 points (+4|-0) Edited

I would appreciate if puerile oligophrenics could refrain from posting mindless bullshit

Unlikely, since it was pretty much created for the express purpose of posting mindless bullshit.

[–] pembo210 7 points (+7|-0)

constructive would be "the button layout could be better if it was like ..." instead of calling people who put time into it "irrational" and having "low word creativity." Also, we've had several different layouts and move stuff around each time based on the features our users have asked for.

[–] Owlchemy 7 points (+7|-0)

Looks like it's time to say the proverbial words 'don't feed the trolls.'

Is Phuks perfect ... probably not ... but perfection never happens and functionally it's a great site. I've never been a Redditor, but am known on other similar worlds such as Voat. I very much enjoy it here and see no major flaws. I've also learned in my short time on Phuks that when a flaw is discovered it is quickly addressed. One can't ask for more. And as you noted 'constructive criticism' requires that something constructive be discussed.

BTW, one major problem that all these sites have is that someone comes in, posts a little or even lurks for awhile and then they speak as if 'it's their site' or belongs to their little clique ... they feel they own it and only their opinion counts. I've never looked at it that way myself. Those of you who put your money on the line and write the code for all are the 'owners'. People like myself or our little troll, no matter how active, are simply visitors on someone else's dime. Keep up the good work ... it takes time, but you're building a great site here with a future.

[–] Smartech [OP] -1 points (+0|-1)

our users have asked for

What users? You mean the few posters around here?

The list of obvious mistakes is too long. I can't physically make it alone.

[–] [Deleted] 8 points (+8|-0)

lack the wording creativity to adequately explain what, specifically, is wrong, eh?

[–] jidlaph 5 points (+5|-0) Edited

Also the fact that this site is called Phuks instead of Phux denotes low level in wording creativity

How 90s.

[–] Polsaker 5 points (+5|-0)

Hi. I'll make sure to fix all the problems you're listed on your post, wait a second....

... there, done.

[–] PMYA 3 points (+3|-0)

Can you at least give specifics?

[–] Smartech [OP] -1 points (+0|-1)

It's easy. Combine together Reddit and Voat designs and you will have a perfectly ergonomic design for Phuks. I can't spend my time in pointing everything that is messed up or missing here, unless I am sure that the owner is seriously interested in my help.

[–] PMYA 3 points (+3|-0)

I designed the layout. I am asking you for specifics. Do I have to get on my knees?

[–] Smartech [OP] -1 points (+0|-1)

OK. Nice meeting you. Here is an easy example. The "night mode" must be of grey graphite color instead of black color to be ergonomic for sight. If you can fix this, I will make the list of all the other errors I can find.

[–] [Deleted] 2 points (+2|-0)

I just want to point out that while my behavior is erratic and annoying I am not a shitheel with an agenda. Can you say the same Op pee. Pp.