Mr Branczik told the Financial Times the auction house was trying to "figure out" what the stunt means.
I'll tell you what it means and all you have to do is understand a little of Banksy. He feels art can't be owned. Period. The commercialization of art is anathema to art. In case you don't remember: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DX1iplQQJTo
>Mr Branczik told the Financial Times the auction house was trying to "figure out" what the stunt means.
I'll tell you what it means and all you have to do is understand a little of Banksy. He feels art can't be owned. Period. The commercialization of art is anathema to art. In case you don't remember: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DX1iplQQJTo
I'll tell you what it means and all you have to do is understand a little of Banksy. He feels art can't be owned. Period. The commercialization of art is anathema to art. In case you don't remember: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DX1iplQQJTo