6

5 comments

[–] TheRedArmy [OP] 0 points (+0|-0)

Since it's dealing with fictional characters, I don't particularly care one way or the other. I imagine for most people it's either satirizing it, or they're just trying to avoid trouble (I know of one case in the UK where a man was arrested for artwork depicting CP - no actual living humans were harmed, but he was sent to prison anyway), so I just don't make a fuss either way.

I see what you mean though. I don't think anyone actually thinks it's not taboo, except that, by the letter of most written laws, it would be legal, so it can probably either be seen as a satire on the taboo nature of it or just a quick "run-around" of the law (I put that in quotes because it's not a particularly useful or effective defense).

[+] [Deleted] 1 points (+1|-0)