I have been sat thinking about this for the past 10 minutes, and I realised that there is also another important variable missing. Women have not been factored in at all. They made their jerk algorithm based on the assumption that jerking off every guy in the room would be the best way to ensure maximum satisfaction, but completely forgot about the women.
On top of this, there is still no way to solve the girth problem, so some kind of girth sorting system would need to be implemented before the process could even begin.
Perhaps we need a /s/MeanJerkTime or /s/JerkAlgorithm to figure this out once and for all?
And what happens if the equivalent girth tolerance leaves an odd number remainder? Is there time enough to treat the remainder with compromised efficiency?
I think we can analyze SDBH itself for some insights, since it is, in effect, the continuous realization of the mean jerk time algorithm. If we model SDBH dynamics and implement a matching discrete time system we may have an ideal final solution.
They are totally hyper focused on the most efficient jerk algorithm that they neglect other ways of achieving the same outcome.
If we take the desired outcome to be satisfied audience members, the jerk algorithm can be complemented with penetrative methods of bringing member satisfaction, bringing the concurrent servicing rate to 6.
Possible caveats to this approach include differing levels of audience satisfaction, and a potential requirement of sorting members by their preferred method.