The raid didn't 'leave the town divided', it exposed a division that already existed.
This 'article' seems to be more of an emotional appeal to politics than a source of facts or information. More propaganda parading as journalism.
Thanks for using an archive. I refuse to give views to the Nyt. They have fallen so far.
The raid didn't 'leave the town divided', it exposed a division that already existed.
This 'article' seems to be more of an emotional appeal to politics than a source of facts or information. More propaganda parading as journalism.
Thanks for using an archive. I refuse to give views to the Nyt. They have fallen so far.
The raid didn't 'leave the town divided', it exposed a division that already existed.
This 'article' seems to be more of an emotional appeal to politics than a source of facts or information. More propaganda parading as journalism.
Thanks for using an archive. I refuse to give views to the Nyt. They have fallen so far.