And his appearance on Colbert's show, which I thought was interesting for the non answers and question dodging Stone engaged in. Of course, maybe he gets these gigs because he doesn't express oersonal politics. On the other hand, that leaves the door open for propaganda. And I would say it is very difficult to make a creative work that is neutral: every word, every cut, every inclusion, can assume or dismiss perspectives on the issue or give fringe views undue weight.
I think it is important for there to be people who question and express political views. Maybe that's Colbert's job and not Stone's. Thoughts?
And [his appearance on Colbert's show](https://youtube.com/watch?v=k6XQOD-7VhA), which I thought was interesting for the non answers and question dodging Stone engaged in. Of course, maybe he gets these gigs because he doesn't express oersonal politics. On the other hand, that leaves the door open for propaganda. And I would say it is very difficult to make a creative work that is neutral: every word, every cut, every inclusion, can assume or dismiss perspectives on the issue or give fringe views undue weight.
I think it is important for there to be people who question and express political views. Maybe that's Colbert's job and not Stone's. Thoughts?
And his appearance on Colbert's show, which I thought was interesting for the non answers and question dodging Stone engaged in. Of course, maybe he gets these gigs because he doesn't express oersonal politics. On the other hand, that leaves the door open for propaganda. And I would say it is very difficult to make a creative work that is neutral: every word, every cut, every inclusion, can assume or dismiss perspectives on the issue or give fringe views undue weight.
I think it is important for there to be people who question and express political views. Maybe that's Colbert's job and not Stone's. Thoughts?