This has been an ever-present problem on aggregate sites like Phuks, Reddit, Voat, and others.
When you see a post that says something you disagree with, even if you think it's terribly thought out and really gets your blood boiling, you shouldn't just downvote it and keep scrolling.
Why?
Because downvotes ultimately limit the exposure of content. This is a good thing when it allows the user base to address the guy spamming us with Indian massage deals, but someone with opinions you don't like doesn't belong in the same category as that.
When we start organizing the exposure of opinionated posts, especially political ones, based on how we feel about those opinions, we are on track to become a close-minded group-think site like Voat. Politics on Phuks has been pretty mild anyway, but if that were to change, the same thing can easily happen here and ruin the atmosphere we all enjoy about this place. We shouldn't want to discourage posters from having discussions here in the same way we discourage people from posting spam.
So instead of using downvote as a disagree button, use the one that says 'Submit comment', and then either upvote or abstain. If you downvote, you are not doing any favors to Phuks as a platform for discussion. You are engaging in group censorship.
Kind of agree, but if someone is being borderline retarded, I'm going to downvote them.