Neither does the author of the article.
Okay, so imagine you’re looking at a picture of a woman in her underwear. Now, of course, the first thing that comes into your head is: “Is this woman being sexually objectified?” Because, obviously, if she is you’re going to stop looking at her immediately. (Right?) But if, instead, the woman in the photo is being sexually empowered, then it’s your duty (as a good feminist, or feminist ally) to keep looking. Even if she’s ugly and you’re busy. But, how can you tell the difference between sexual empowerment and sexual objectification? Well, just ask your friends at Everyday Feminism!
Yeah. The whole article was tongue-in-cheek. Funny stuff.
I liked this section the best.
If you’re trying to get a girl to have sex with you and she says no, don’t tell her she’s beautiful or sexy or anything like that. No. That would be objectifying. Try offering her some money to have sex with you instead. Now that’s empowerment.
Good thing I don't care what feminists think.