8

5 comments

[–] jobes 4 points (+4|-0)

The following statements are included:

“You speak good English.”

“When I look at you I don’t see color.”

“America is a melting pot.”

“America is the land of opportunity.”

“Everyone can succeed in this society if they work hard enough.”

How long until people start deeming the phrase "America is a country" as a cultural and racial micro-aggression? I'm happy the author calls bullshit on people trying to say "XYZ is offensive to those people!", but the author still seems to support micro-aggression training if they get "better sources" on trigger words.

[–] TheRedArmy [OP] 3 points (+3|-0)

How long until people start deeming the phrase "America is a country" as a cultural and racial micro-aggression? I'm happy the author calls bullshit on people trying to say "XYZ is offensive to those people!", but the author still seems to support micro-aggression training if they get "better sources" on trigger words.

I basically agree with your assessment and feelings on the matter.

[–] pembo210 3 points (+3|-0)

What if I'm offended by the answer?

[–] Boukert 2 points (+2|-0)

You're a white CIS male, your fee fees don't matter in this clusterfuck it seems!

[–] TheRedArmy [OP] 2 points (+2|-0)

A sound approach to teaching “cultural competence” might inform by exploring the history of blackface; or why Sikhs carry a small knife; or common challenges that orthodox Christian students experience on secular campuses; or the historical experience of a Native tribe with many members enrolled; or differences in classroom culture that Chinese exchange students might exhibit; or the hijab’s meaning. Such particulars would best be shaped by the composition of the student body at a given institution.

But when training faculty members or educating students so that they are “culturally competent,” a process that should involve telling them pertinent facts, is instead used as a pretext to indoctrinate them into a contested ideology, the laudable becomes objectionable.