I don't think 3D cameras are that much more expensive, it's just 2 synced cameras.
I also think big budget cinema can't use 3D properly because they use green screens a lot and therefore have not much depth to begin with and need to do it in post anyway.
I'm not saying I have seen a good 3D movie, I just don't think this video makes the right points.
The PS2 argument doesn't stand either, according to the video. they just used outdated shader and poly quality and rendered twice, not really an innovation.
I don't think 3D cameras are that much more expensive, it's just 2 synced cameras.
I also think big budget cinema can't use 3D properly because they use green screens a lot and therefore have not much depth to begin with and need to do it in post anyway.
I'm not saying I have seen a good 3D movie, I just don't think this video makes the right points.
The PS2 argument doesn't stand either, according to the video. they just used outdated shader and poly quality and rendered twice, not really an innovation.
I don't think 3D cameras are that much more expensive, it's just 2 synced cameras.
I also think big budget cinema can't use 3D properly because they use green screens a lot and therefore have not much depth to begin with and need to do it in post anyway.
I'm not saying I have seen a good 3D movie, I just don't think this video makes the right points.
The PS2 argument doesn't stand either, according to the video. they just used outdated shader and poly quality and rendered twice, not really an innovation.