2

4 comments

[–] [Deleted] 1 points (+1|-0)

A Met document, seen by the Guardian, says the project “will carry out profiling on a large scale”, with males aged 15 to 21 a focus of the project. After questioning, the force said both of these were a mistake.

The usual lies and evasiveness by the Met.

[–] CDanger 0 points (+0|-0)

They should do this. It's incredibly easy to predict which individuals will commit crime in the future. Hint: it's not 80-year old women. The first step to solving a problem is having an accurate and honest view of the situation.

[–] [Deleted] 1 points (+1|-0)

Human rights are a thing, especially when it comes to children.

[–] smallpond [OP] 1 points (+1|-0)

It's incredibly easy to predict which individuals will commit crime in the future.

Well, no. You'll get an estimated probability for each person and the prediction won't be 100%. So how does it work? Do you invasively monitor all people with X% or greater probability of lawbreaking? That's prejudicial/unfair treatment of a select group of citizens - punishing the innocent before they are proven guilty. I suppose once the process is streamlined you just drop X to zero and monitor everything everyone says... and the system becomes so powerful it attracts corruption and abuse, and we slide further into dystopia.