This looks like a case of facts vs. feelings.
The poster is factually correct. Almost all the homeless are either addicts, or mentally ill.
Giving money to shelters and charities is far more effective than giving directly to the homeless. Giving to the street-people just enables and feeds the problem.
The article seems to demonize anyone who tries to actually help them homeless.
Giving money to homeless hurts them.
This poster helps them.
So who's the bad-guy here? In my opinion it's the ignorant journalist, and other complainers.
This looks like a case of facts vs. feelings.
The poster is factually correct. Almost all the homeless are either addicts, or mentally ill.
Giving money to shelters and charities is far more effective than giving directly to the homeless. Giving to the street-people just enables and feeds the problem.
The article seems to demonize anyone who tries to actually help them homeless.
Giving money to homeless hurts them.
This poster helps them.
So who's the bad-guy here? In my opinion it's the ignorant journalist, and other complainers.
This looks like a case of facts vs. feelings.
The poster is factually correct. Almost all the homeless are either addicts, or mentally ill.
Giving money to shelters and charities is far more effective than giving directly to the homeless. Giving to the street-people just enables and feeds the problem.
The article seems to demonize anyone who tries to actually help them homeless. Giving money to homeless hurts them.
This poster helps them.
So who's the bad-guy here? In my opinion it's the ignorant journalist, and other complainers.