Revised UK child sexual 'consent' rules provoke backlash

[–] PMYA [OP] 4 points (+4|-0)

Sexually abused children as young as 12 could still be refused compensation by a government body on the grounds that they “consented,” under revised rules seen by the Guardian.

If it is illegal to have sex with children because they can not give consent, how can they be denied compensation because they gave consent?

permalink
source

[–] TheRedArmy 2 points (+2|-0)

If it is illegal to have sex with children because they can not give consent, how can they be denied compensation because they gave consent?

How dare you! You're just a racist/sexist/homophobe/Islamophobe/KKK, etc, etc....

Seriously, that question completely pierces the "logic" of this measure.

permalink
source

[–] PMYA [OP] 2 points (+2|-0)

In my opinion, we need to start blaming the sexy kids.

permalink
source

[–] seeking_virtue 2 points (+3|-1)

Muslims

permalink
source

Revised UK child sexual 'consent' rules provoke backlash

4 comments

/s/UnitedKingdom