Nice point. It does, in this case, raise the question if a girl is old and mature enough to give consent to a man or woman of 19 or 20, why isn't she old or mature enough to give it to a man of or woman of 40?
Don't pounce on me people, just playing devil's advocate here.
Nice point. It does, in this case, raise the question if a girl is old and mature enough to give consent to a man or woman of 19 or 20, why isn't she old or mature enough to give it to a man of or woman of 40?
Don't pounce on me people, just playing devil's advocate here.
Not talking about this particular case or law but...
Actually Loeb is incorrect, juries are fully within their rights to decide if a law is unwise that's why jury nullification exists https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification#United_States