“Instead of doing their job, they worried about themselves, they stayed outside, they worried only about their own safety, knowing that people were literally getting mowed down by the dozens just a few feet away.”
"The police are not allowed to detain you even if you are the victim of a terrible crime, even if they need to interview you,” Radner told ABC News. “You don't get to decide that the Fourth Amendment doesn't apply and to just go and arrest people. You don't get to do that and that's what they did.”
I'm interested to see this part of the lawsuit play out.
>“Instead of doing their job, they worried about themselves, they stayed outside, they worried only about their own safety, knowing that people were literally getting mowed down by the dozens just a few feet away.”
Good luck with that. The police have no duty to protect you. [Warren v. District of Columbia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia)
>"The police are not allowed to detain you even if you are the victim of a terrible crime, even if they need to interview you,” Radner told ABC News. “You don't get to decide that the Fourth Amendment doesn't apply and to just go and arrest people. You don't get to do that and that's what they did.”
I'm interested to see this part of the lawsuit play out.
Good luck with that. The police have no duty to protect you. Warren v. District of Columbia
I'm interested to see this part of the lawsuit play out.