9

4 comments

[–] GumpyBastard 4 points (+4|-0)

I am amazed that they had to say that searching private property on private property required a search warrant. Why would it be reasonable to assume police could walk onto my property and search my vehicles without a warrant.

"Justice Samuel Alito dissented from the court's ruling, calling it unreasonable. He argued the officers had probable cause" If they had probable cause then it would have been easy to get a warrant.

[–] CDanger 1 points (+1|-0)

Alito has such a hardon for the state in one hand and then in the next case completely reverts and wants to limit any government power that infringers on citizen's rights for guns, discrimination, etc. Totally bipolar, and I don't imagine he'll go down on the winning side of history.

[–] revmoo 0 points (+0|-0)

Uhh, that's a Capital One ad, anybody have a link to the news? Actual news?

[–] Owlchemy [OP] 0 points (+0|-0)

It's the actual link when I click it ... from The Hill (thehill.com).