6

9 comments

[–] Owlchemy 1 points (+1|-0)

The liberals are going to be on fire for a good stretch now. He was a conservative, but his decisions could go either way. With a Trump replacement the court would go farther right in all likelihood.

[–] Hitchens [OP] 1 points (+1|-0)

I’m not pleased but I’m not on fire. It’s dissappointing as I have strong views that don’t always align with the court.

I don’t personally want an extreme right court.

We will see how this all plays out and how long it takes to nominate.

[–] Owlchemy 2 points (+2|-0)

It's always best when there's balance. But with all the liberal federal judges out in everywhere USA writing laws as they go along, I think a good correction for a spell can't hurt.

[–] Hitchens [OP] 1 points (+1|-0)

for a spell

Justice appointments are longer then a spell.

I understand your point and the lefts point. I prefer middle of the road approach.

[–] COFfeebreak 0 points (+0|-0)

We will see how this all plays out and how long it takes to nominate.

Thanks to the Dems and Harry Reid in 2013, the "nuclear option" is active now so the Dems can't block the next appointee. Pres Trump already has a list of 25 potentials.

[–] Hitchens [OP] 1 points (+1|-0)

I can remember back far enough to remember how the Republicans blocked Obama’s court picks.

[–] [Deleted] 0 points (+0|-0)

de-Fundamentally Transform America from the last administration.