Clickbait, 60% of the radiation dose limit recommended might sound like much, but it shouldn't dramatically increase your health risks.
Also the articles don't mention shielding, so it might be just based the data the FREND measured.
And:
The results imply that on a six-month journey to the Red Planet, and assuming six-months back again
The first human trips will likely be shorter, with more fuel and less cargo. While later missions will be shielded based on data from the early missions.
>Crazy Amounts
Clickbait, 60% of the radiation dose limit recommended might sound like much, but it shouldn't dramatically increase your health risks.
Also the articles don't mention shielding, so it might be just based the data the [FREND](http://exploration.esa.int/mars/48523-trace-gas-orbiter-instruments/?fbodylongid=2217) measured.
And:
> The results imply that on a six-month journey to the Red Planet, and assuming six-months back again
The first human trips will likely be shorter, with more fuel and less cargo. While later missions will be shielded based on data from the early missions.
Clickbait, 60% of the radiation dose limit recommended might sound like much, but it shouldn't dramatically increase your health risks.
Also the articles don't mention shielding, so it might be just based the data the FREND measured.
And:
The first human trips will likely be shorter, with more fuel and less cargo. While later missions will be shielded based on data from the early missions.