3

4 comments

[–] revmoo 1 points (+1|-0)

I'm a total anthropocentric climate change denier. Global warming alarmism is a terrific way to control a people. If you can tell people what house they're allowed to live in, what car they're allowed to drive, what job they're allowed to have, you have essentially total control over that populace. We're rocketing towards renewable energy at absolute breakneck speed, emissions are down drastically everywhere, and nearly every metric you can measure we're improving rapidly on, and yet all we hear about is about how we're all doomed unless we drastically alter every person on Earth's lifestyle. Fuck that.

Also I find it really amusing how climate change people will blame global warming for a FIRE (but not negligent forest husbandry and building codes) but if you mention how cold it is outside they'll jump down your throat about how weather is not climate.

I don't need to look at the facts (though I have). All I have to know that anthropocentric climate change is a load of bullshit is to look at who is using it as a vessel to push societal change.

[–] ThinWhiteDuke 1 points (+1|-0)

Climate science is a platoon of archers littering a battlefield with thousands of arrows. One squad came forward and said "Hey, maybe that last round of arrows we fired were a little bit bent. They might have hit the target, but we aren't sure. That shipment didn't undergo the normal QA protocol."

So, let's just pack it all in and fire the entire platoon, right?

[–] chmod 0 points (+0|-0)

The really disturbing problem was that study went through peer-review before being published.

Peer review means precisely dick when all the peers are bought and paid for climate hoax shills.