One anti-nuclear member argued that it is too late to stop the climate crisis anyway, and since nuclear power cannot function during a crisis, we must not use it. This defeatist attitude shocked us; in the audience, several attendees began to laugh in disbelief. This was an incredible statement for a party that takes combating climate change as one of its major goals. The fight was over.
I can see how the Green party might be shocked by it being too late to stop the climate crisis, but I think most people aren't. There's only so far hopium will take most people.
Nuclear energy grants Finland multiple forms of independence: from relations with the Kremlin, from coal or natural gas, and from the weather that prevents Finland from relying merely on solar and wind.
The Russian invasion seems to have accomplished what decades of scientific knowledge about greenhouse gasses couldn’t.
It's obviously a one-sided article, not that there's anything so wrong with that. I have to wonder if the comments above are getting more towards the heart of the matter.
> One anti-nuclear member argued that it is too late to stop the climate crisis anyway, and since nuclear power cannot function during a crisis, we must not use it. This defeatist attitude shocked us; in the audience, several attendees began to laugh in disbelief. This was an incredible statement for a party that takes combating climate change as one of its major goals. The fight was over.
I can see how the Green party might be shocked by it being too late to stop the climate crisis, but I think most people aren't. There's only so far hopium will take most people.
> Nuclear energy grants Finland multiple forms of independence: from relations with the Kremlin, from coal or natural gas, and from the weather that prevents Finland from relying merely on solar and wind.
> The Russian invasion seems to have accomplished what decades of scientific knowledge about greenhouse gasses couldn’t.
It's obviously a one-sided article, not that there's anything so wrong with that. I have to wonder if the comments above are getting more towards the heart of the matter.
I can see how the Green party might be shocked by it being too late to stop the climate crisis, but I think most people aren't. There's only so far hopium will take most people.
It's obviously a one-sided article, not that there's anything so wrong with that. I have to wonder if the comments above are getting more towards the heart of the matter.