China is not alone.
You could use the name Russia or US instead and this article would probably be just as accurate.
I expect that there are many other nations with those goals, but less tec or industry to achieve them.
I think the future of warfare will be a balance of automated smart weapons, and electronic countermeasures.
Anyone that isn't already working on it, won't be a world power when that technology matures.
China is not alone.
You could use the name Russia or US instead and this article would probably be just as accurate.
I expect that there are many other nations with those goals, but less tec or industry to achieve them.
I think the future of warfare will be a balance of automated smart weapons, and electronic countermeasures.
Anyone that isn't already working on it, won't be a world power when that technology matures.
No memes or images. Exceptions may be made in the case of images of an ongoing news story becoming available.
User-edited titles are not allowed. Copy the headline directly and use it as the post title. Corrections in spelling or minor alterations may be acceptable.
News articles written over a month before posting must have the date of the article in the post title.
No paywalls. Use an archived link to post a paywalled article.
China is not alone.
You could use the name Russia or US instead and this article would probably be just as accurate.
I expect that there are many other nations with those goals, but less tec or industry to achieve them.
I think the future of warfare will be a balance of automated smart weapons, and electronic countermeasures.
Anyone that isn't already working on it, won't be a world power when that technology matures.