Gizmodo didn't reach out to Voat admins to verify their side of the story before publishing it, as would be normal journalistic practice. To find out what really happened you'd need to find out who has sent those takedown mails to Archive.is from which e-mail adress.
Gizmodo didn't reach out to Voat admins to verify their side of the story before publishing it, as would be normal journalistic practice. To find out what really happened you'd need to find out who has sent those takedown mails to Archive.is from which e-mail adress.
I thought the article had finished at the mid ad, and did not even see the rest of if. That being said, I still maintain that it very well could have been them, not that I really care what they do or who they do it to on voat.
I thought the article had finished at the mid ad, and did not even see the rest of if. That being said, I still maintain that it very well could have been them, not that I really care what they do or who they do it to on voat.
Yeah, because they would definitely come out and say they did if that were the case. They would never lie to save face...