Thanks, it's just the IPCC reports page, but I see they've changed the format:
Thanks, it's just the IPCC reports page, but I see they've changed the format:
https://www.ipcc.ch/reports/
Um, the IPCC? Because they've been so accurate with their models?
https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/christy_dec8.jpg
Um, the IPCC? Because they've been so accurate with their models?
https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/christy_dec8.jpg
As if anyone is supposed to take some random, dodgy image from "JR Christy" seriously?
Here's the actual temperature data. How about you look through the actual IPCC reports and give me the page reference where they predict the wrong thing?
As if anyone is supposed to take some random, dodgy image from "JR Christy" seriously?
Here's the [actual temperature data](https://climate.nasa.gov/system/content_pages/main_images/1309_temp-data-from-science-institutions.jpg). How about you look through the actual IPCC reports and give me the page reference where they predict the wrong thing?
If you really knew anything about climate you'd know who "JR Christy" and Roy Spencer are. But you don't.
If you really knew anything about climate you'd know who "JR Christy" and Roy Spencer are. But you don't.
I'm sure we can trust "NoTricksZone" not to cherrypick dodgy funded articles from shitty journals, and to also report on the number and quality of articles that do assert that CO2 has a significant effect on global temperature.
Perhaps try reading some reputable scientific reports.