The Voat Situation

I'm late to the party on this post, as I was away for the weekend, but:

ProtectVoat is not the "crusader defending Voat from evil SRSers" that it pretended to be. ProtectVoat was the main instigator in killing TheDinnerTable. They are more interested in controlling Voat and how the subs are run, or can/should be run than protecting it. So I wouldn't be surprised about any type of fuckery that may be debated on or executed by any of its members.

So this isn't the place to push my ultra nationalist pureblood white race after-school club after all?

Well phuck.

I think the solution is to find any post about phuks on https://preview.voat.co/v/all and downvote it.

If they are above average users they will find this place on there own. If they are retards that just follow any link and copy the lowest effort crap from one place and paste it another place then they are likely to follow such a link.

The point is that they would have to come over in a flow rather than the traffic growing too fast. One thing you could do is rate limit your registration process. How many users interacted today? That's the most that can register in a day.

For adults with non minimum wage gigs in which they are their own boss, anti-feminist wives who are based enough to share their non-PC views, children that they homeschool and gun-related hobbies that aren't degenerate, Voaters should have plenty to keep them busy over the weekend. Just try to log in on Monday. If it works, fine, if not, crack open Mein Kampf and gather the kids and wife around for family time, lol. One website is not your life, and someone on SSI will open another site if voat is dead eventually.

I am very irritated by the post by kevdude and the behavior of voaters towards phuks. Every time a new influx of users would join Voat, they would behave like idiots and act as we had to.conform to their ways and us goats would call them out and remind them that proper assimilation into the community requires following our rules. Now, Voat is down and those Jack asses are coming here and behaving exactly like those idiot refugees. It's stupid, childish, and it shows what kevdude,.and others real intentions are.

I don't believe for a second that PuttItOut simply hasn't realized voat is down. Server alerts and shit, if he's "on vacation" and ignoring severe alerts for days then voat's already done for, if not now then soon.

I'd probably stay here, but it pretty much sucks on an iPad. The site is pretty much unusable with my iPad and using Mobile Safari. I don't actually install anything on the tablet, I just use it as it came default. That's not a policy I'm willing to change.

I suppose I could consider sacrificing a laptop. I do a lot of my 'net activity from the warm environs of my couch or sometimes even snuggled up in bed. Laptops don't vent heat well on such surfaces and it'd mean my laptop would die an earlier death. That might actually be worth it.

Using this site, Atko has confirmed that Voat is not being abandoned.

He said that "I don't have any info on what happened. At this point, everything is possible" - this does not exclude the possibility that voat is abandoned.

There is a difference between open discussion and merely being a cunt. This is not Stormfront, and you will be expected to be civil(remember /v/thedinnertable?).

What if you have an open discussion with someone whom you consider to be or act like a cunt?

Is it allowed to have civil and polite discussions about controversial subjects, like heritability of IQ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ) and trans-racial adoption studies (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study)?

I've read the TOS, it states that "Posting content of any kind that incites discrimination, hate or violence towards one person or a group of people because of their belonging to a race, religion or nation is strictly prohibited.".

Now, to discuss these things would not be inciting violence, "hate" is subjective but I don't think it qualifies to stating facts in a neutral manner. (though some may attribute that as an intention, which cannot be proven) and "discrimination" is vague, is it discriminatory to state discriminatory facts?

the userbase is composed of "faggots who attack Voat" and "cancer mods."

We never attacked Voat, some of us just pestered PV and only PV. It's been at least 18 months since I've been back to Voat. Kevdude holds quite the grudge

Assuming we keep the clientele decent, would the Phukkers who have been here a while like to see the place grow substantially, to where some of the specialty subs have more content?

I don't see the site ever being on level with reddit, mostly because of the name, but I'd love a community the size of Voat's without all the morons raving about Jews in every single thread.

This place needs a 'protectphuks' to ward off protectvoat asses from taking over this place. I am somewhat convinced they are the reason voat is down at the moment. Am I the only one that saw how hard kevdude was being hammered over censorship the moment it went down?